With the shock news that Lance Armstrong will no longer contest doping charges, where does this leave his record?
It should be pointed out that he has admitted nothing, and that he states that the anti-doping agency USADA has no jurisdiction over his titles as they didn't award them.
if Lance Armstrong was so successful in a period where "cheating" was commonplace, how could he win so many times without also "cheating"?
It should be pointed out that he has admitted nothing, and that he states that the anti-doping agency USADA has no jurisdiction over his titles as they didn't award them.
The main evidence against Mr Armstrong is circumstantial.
- Several of his team mates have been caught doping (with blood transfusions and/or EPO and/or steroids, detectable or otherwise)
- Many (perhaps even most) of the riders in the earlier part of his period of success (the early 2000s) were doping (with blood transfusions and/or EPO and/or steroids, detectable or otherwise)
if Lance Armstrong was so successful in a period where "cheating" was commonplace, how could he win so many times without also "cheating"?