I cycled a 100km "sportive" two days ago.
It had an "official" route, and the rider numbers had a timing chip on them, so start and finish times were recorded automatically as we (the riders) went through the start/finish arch.
Isn't technology wonderful.
So, like many others, I looked up my performance on Strava.
I found two "whole course" segments had already been set up by other riders.
The "bench marks" I am using are the "official" route I got from the organisers as a TCX file that I loaded into Garmin Connect, and my "official" "chipped" finishing time (all finishing times are published by the organisers, and available for all to see.
The "benchmark" route was 101.77km (from the "official" TCX route, remember).
So how did the "whole course" segments measure up?
This one comes in at 100.5 km, so sounds right to someone without the "official" route TCX to compare it to - indeed, the rider might have taken a great "line" on every corner and come in just a touch under the "official" route length, so it could be right.
And the time?
It's knocked 7 minutes and 20 seconds off my "official" finish time! It clearly is not measuring all of the route, or the rider took a shortcut (!), or the GPS errors mean it has rounded off some corners etc. etc.
Verdict: Someone has a smartphone (?), and they just chose a section that sounded about the right length.
Update: A route analysis shows that the route start on a straight section on the main road. Useful for perhaps longer training, without having to go down the road to the stadium, but with about a km clipped of the start and end of the "official" route, it is clearly NOT the entire route! The missing couple of kilometres seems to explain the missing time as well.
It had an "official" route, and the rider numbers had a timing chip on them, so start and finish times were recorded automatically as we (the riders) went through the start/finish arch.
Isn't technology wonderful.
So, like many others, I looked up my performance on Strava.
I found two "whole course" segments had already been set up by other riders.
The "bench marks" I am using are the "official" route I got from the organisers as a TCX file that I loaded into Garmin Connect, and my "official" "chipped" finishing time (all finishing times are published by the organisers, and available for all to see.
The "benchmark" route was 101.77km (from the "official" TCX route, remember).
So how did the "whole course" segments measure up?
This one comes in at 100.5 km, so sounds right to someone without the "official" route TCX to compare it to - indeed, the rider might have taken a great "line" on every corner and come in just a touch under the "official" route length, so it could be right.
And the time?
It's knocked 7 minutes and 20 seconds off my "official" finish time! It clearly is not measuring all of the route, or the rider took a shortcut (!), or the GPS errors mean it has rounded off some corners etc. etc.
Verdict: Someone has a smartphone (?), and they just chose a section that sounded about the right length.
Update: A route analysis shows that the route start on a straight section on the main road. Useful for perhaps longer training, without having to go down the road to the stadium, but with about a km clipped of the start and end of the "official" route, it is clearly NOT the entire route! The missing couple of kilometres seems to explain the missing time as well.

